Archive

Archive for the ‘Ubuntu’ Category

Where is our national pride?

August 15th, 2008 Comments

Simon Dingle made an interesting comment when we were in Japan recently. He spoke about how in Japan there is a sense of tremendous national pride coupled with an almost unspoken distinction drawn between the Japanese and people who are simply not Japanese. This pride inspires the Japanese to be so good at what they do.

Colour by coda.jpgI was thinking about the stuff we put up with here and Simon’s point got me thinking about South African national pride, or rather, the apparent lack thereof. Despite the hope for a rainbow nation in the early years after the 1994 elections, we remain a deeply divided nation. We are divided across all the lines which we hoped to bridge: race, gender, cultural heritage, political alignment and religion. There has been talk in the past about what it actually means to be South African and what identifying as South African actually means beyond being a statement of citizenship.

I just don’t know that there is a coherent sense of South African identity. We don’t have the kind of national identity and national pride that drives us to do better and excel at what we do as South Africans. We are far more concerned with our own communities and, in many cases, even smaller groups of people we identify with. The distinction between South African and not South African is a question of which ID book you hold. Without a clear and strong sense of national pride we remain a hodgepodge collection of racial, cultural, political, religious and gender-based groups huddling under this umbrella term: “South African”. This boils down to a lack of respect for each other as human beings and fellow South Africans and we see that in our daily lives through the way people treat each other and how we don’t look at each other anymore.

Even our government doesn’t speak about a rainbow nation anymore. Have we lost our national pride altogether?

Image: Colour by coda licensed under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial ShareAlike 2.0 license

Technorati Tags:
, , ,

SA government adopts Open Document Format as standard

October 24th, 2007 Comments

The Department of Public Service and Administration has set out the requirements for what it considers to be an open standard for implementation in government departments. The document it published is called the Mininimum Interoperability Standards for Information Systems in government (MIOS) and it sets out a series of standards which government departments are required to adhere to:

Improved public service delivery tailored to citizen and business needs, as envisioned in the e-Government Strategic Framework: Accelerating Service Delivery 2014, published in 2007, requires the seamless flow of information across all tiers of Government. The Minimum Information Interoperability Standards (MIOS) sets out the Government’s technical principles and standards for achieving interoperability and information systems coherence across the public sector. The MIOS defines the essential pre-requisite for joined-up and web enabled Government. Next to security, it is an essential component in the overall e-Government strategy.

Adherence to the MIOS standards and policies is mandatory as set out in the proposed chapter five of the Public Service Regulations. They set the underlying infrastructure, freeing up public sector organizations so they can concentrate on serving the customer through building value added information and services. It is the responsibility of individual departments to improve their business processes so that they are more effective, and to take advantage of the opportunities provided by increased interoperability.

The main thrust of the framework (in line with international best practice), is the adoption of a structured approach with regard to information systems. To achieve this approach, and to ensure the enhancement of interoperability across Government, a minimum set of standards are included in this document as a required Government-wide standard. To this end, this updated version of MIOS contains an explicit definition of Open Standards as well as the inclusion of the ISO (International Standards Organisation) Open Document Format.

The objective of achieving interoperability must be managed as a long-term ongoing initiative. In this regard the Government Information Technology Officers Council, (GITOC) which consists of representatives from all Government Departments including provincial and local Government, are crucial and instrumental in carrying this objective forwards and through to implementation.

It is also essential to ensure that MIOS remains up to date and aligned to stakeholder requirements, so that it can embrace the potential of new technology as well as market developments. In this instance, collaboration becomes a critical success factor for the formulation of strategic synergies.

What this all comes down to is that the government is phasing in technologies that support open standards which is, in turn, the cornerstone of this policy framework:

2.3 Open Standards

2.3.1 There are number of definitions of open standards which emphasise different aspects of openness, including of the resulting specification, the openness of the drafting process, and the ownership of rights in the standard. The list below contains frequently cited indicators of the openness of a standard. For the purposes of the MIOS, a standard shall be considered open if it meets all of these criteria. There are standards which we are obliged to adopt for pragmatic reasons which do not necessarily fully conform to being open in all respects. In such cases, where an open standard does not yet exist, the degree of openness will be taken into account when selecting an appropriate standard:

  • it should be maintained by a non-commercial organization
  • participation in the ongoing development work is based on decision-making processes that are open to all interested parties.
  • open access: all may access committee documents, drafts and completed standards free of cost or for a negligible fee.
  • It must be possible for everyone to copy, distribute and use the standard free of cost.
  • The intellectual rights required to implement the standard (e.g. essential patent claims) are irrevocably available, without any royalties attached.
  • There are no reservations regarding reuse of the standard.
  • There are multiple implementations of the standard

While this document may not explicitly say so, it pretty much excludes Microsoft’s Office Open XML as a candidate for acceptance in terms of this framework barring some fundamental changes to the OOXML specification and how it is maintained and developed. This decision is fantastic news for open access advocates and even better news for South Africans who don’t have access to expensive, proprietary software.

For more on this, take a look at this article on Tectonic.

Technorati Tags:
, , , , , ,

Judge lambasts SA Police Service

September 5th, 2006 Comments

A farm labourer, Fanie Tshabalala, who stabbed his mother 35 times almost went free after the police bungled his case and failed to procure key DNA forensic evidence.  The judge hearing the matter in the Harrismith Circuit Court, Judge Arrie Hattingh heavily criticised National Police Commissioner, Jackie Selebi who he accused of not doing his job.  Key evidence disappeared from the Warden police station and the police involved in the investigation had no idea what had happened to the evidence.  Ironically, the accused’s decision to give evidence in his defence sealed his fate.  He proved himself to be a liar and his evidence, coupled with other testimony led to his conviction.  Were it not for his decision to give evidence in his own defence, Judge Hattingh said he would have had to free Tshabalala.

Ultimately Judge Hattingh laid the blame on Selebi who the judge described as either not interested or ignorant of the state of affairs in the SAPS.  The forensic police were not blamed for the lack of evidence as they either did not have the evidence to examine or lacked the equipment to conduct a proper examination.  South African crime labs are a far cry from the crime labs we see in the CSI series.  Local forensic laboratories are grossly understaffed and under-equipped to do their job.

When the Makwanyane case was heard over a decade ago (this is the Constitutional Court case that outlawed the death penalty), one of the points made was that the death penalty is not a deterrence if criminals know they are going to be caught.  The inability of the police to identify and catch criminals undermines the criminal justice system and will lead to a complete disregard for the law.  We see how high priority cases are dealt with immediately by the police and yet the crimes that happen in everyday life are hardly given the same attention.  While this may a generalisation (there are, thankfully, many dedicated and hardworking police officers doing their utmost to solve crimes and bring criminals to court), the perception that the police are disinterested or incapable of doing their jobs is a powerful perception.

It isn’t the case that criminals are far more technologically advanced than the police and the police are, despite their best efforts, simply incapable of catching them.  The main problem here is one of priorities.  The government has consistently failed to dedicate the kinds of resources that are required to fully equip the police at all levels, recruit, train and retain police officers.  Their salaries are abysmal (as was evident in a recent Carte Blanche expose on police officers moonlighting and even running their own businesses during their working days) and they are demotivated by their working conditions.

The scandal over the arms deals perhaps highlight the root cause of this problem facing the criminal justice system today.  Amounts of money few people can conceptualise are used to buy military hardware which is not nearly as urgently needed as forensic equipment for the police, body armour, vehicles, weapons, decent salaries and more personnel.

This crisis extends beyond the SAPS and encompasses the court system as well.  Some time ago Carte Blanche had a story about a computerised system that was being tested in the Durban Magistrates Court which basically created digital versions of police dockets and which would, if implemented, put an end the problem of dockets disappearing.  It is reasonable to expect that this system would have been thoroughly tested and rolled out to more courts and yet the project faltered due to lack of resources and support from the Department of Justice.  The technology exists to revolutionise and optimise the operation of our courts and all that is required is the will and the determination to make it all happen.  The rapid growth of open source software makes widespread rollouts of computers far cheaper than was possible a few years ago and yet court officials are lucky to have working, networked computers.

It is clear that we in the midst of a crisis.  It is also becoming patently clear that not nearly enough attention is paid to providing the necessary resources to not only the SAPS but also to other essential and often overlooked professions.  The end result will be a breakdown in our society and way of life.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Categories: Courts, Criminal, News, Ubuntu Tags:

Support the Sunflower Fund

December 15th, 2005 Comments

Sunflower_fund_banner
This is a charity I would like to publicise in my own small way.  If you shop at Pick ‘n Pay in South Africa then you may already be aware of this amazing non-profit organisation.  If you don’t know about this charity, keep reading.  Below is a quote from the Sunflower Fund website:

The Sunflower Fund was formed in support of the S.A. BONE MARROW REGISTRY and was inspired by Chris Corlett and Darren Serebro’s heroic struggle against leukaemia. It was formed by a group of parents whose children had contracted leukaemia, and in some cases had lost their battle against it.  Their aim is to rally financial support and increase the number of bone marrow stem cell donors in South Africa . With the odds of finding a donor being 1:100 000, the ideal is to expand the registry to at least 100 000. You can help by joining the S.A. BONE MARROW REGISTRY. All you have to give is two teaspoons of blood!  We need your fast response and long-term commitment.

I was actually at Law School with Darren Serebro.  I had no idea his struggle had such an impact.

If you would like to make a donation, here are the bank account details.  You can donate even if you are outside South Africa so here another opportunity for my wonderful overseas visitors to help out a few people who could really use your help here in South Africa:

ACCOUNT NAME: SUNFLOWER FUND

BANK: ABSA

ACC NUMBER: 4051834719

BRANCH NO: 632005

(SWIFT CODE – FOR INTERNATIONAL DEPOSITS – ABSA ZAJJ)

In reference section, initials "TT" & your surname.

Pay at any Pick & Pay through EasyPay



If you would like to support the Sunflower Fund in other ways, have a look here.

For those interested in reading more about the Sunflower Fund’s mission, here it is:

The Sunflower Fund (Friends of the South African Bone Marrow Registry) is a non-governmental, non-profit organisation based in Cape Town in the Western Cape, South Africa, which operates a national toll-free call center to advise and recruit donors from all over South Africa.

"The Sunflower Fund raises awareness and funds to increase the number of donors on the SA Bone Marrow Registry which will improve the chances of a life saving transplant to patients suffering from serious blood disorders".

Thousands of South Africans are diagnosed annually with life-threatening blood disorders for which a bone marrow transplant from a healthy donor is the only possible life-saving treatment option. 75% of these patients are under the age of 25.

The Sunflower Fund raises funds to support the South African Bone Marrow Registry located at the Medical School of the University of Cape Town, which receives no funding for tissue typing from government. Since February 2003, reorganisation by the National Health Laboratory Service (under whose control all State laboratories now fall) meant that every service performed by the laboratories had to be paid for. The Sunflower Fund carries the responsibility for raising the continual cash flow necessary to meet the costs of all tissue typing of bone marrow donors for the purposes of growing the Registry.

Without our support, the work of the Registry would entirely come to a halt. This would mean that bone marrow transplantation would no longer be offered as a treatment option for the many patients with serious blood disorders such as leukaemia. In addition to fundraising, The Sunflower Fund is actively involved in the recruitment of bone marrow donors.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Categories: Ubuntu Tags: