Archive

Archive for the ‘Opportunities’ Category

Go go alt.conference – a preview of what to expect

June 22nd, 2009 Comments

Update: I can’t figure out how to add the html code for a banner but you can use this version of the logo if you would like to create your own banner!

Alt.conference is around the corner and there are already over 80 people who have joined the Alt.conference site. So what is this all about? Well, here is a nifty poster I just whipped up which gives you the nutshell details of what I hope will be a pretty exciting event:

Please feel free to download the promo poster and pass it around to anyone who would be interested in attending. I’d love to see more social media pros there as well as their clients who would like to see what else is going on in the SA online space.

I am also interested in anyone who is interested in sponsoring the event (if anyone is interested, I have a sponsorship package which may be of interest).

I’ve managed to put together a pretty exciting lineup for the Joburg and Cape Town events. Both events are going to be really interesting and I am kicking myself that I decided to arrange them for the same time. Next time they’ll run on different days so I can attend both. So here are some of the smarties you can expect:

Cape Town

  • Henk Kleynhans
  • David and Marc Perel
  • Allan Kent
  • Gaby Rosario
  • Bev Merriman

Joburg

  • Justin Spratt
  • Nic Haralambous
  • Melissa Attree
  • Max Kaizen

I have also set up a FriendFeed channel which will update realtime (just include the tag “altconf” in your tweets, Flickr uploads etc and the channel should import your mentions). The channel will probably look a little like this:

I chose FriendFeed as the aggregator because it updates in realtime and has terrific conversational capabilities but feel free to chat about alt.conference wherever suits you best and let me know if the FriendFeed channel isn’t importing your feed and I’ll add it.


Alt.conference is being run by my impromptu event business which I am calling Its All Geek To Me (aka Leo Archer CC). The cost to attend is R250 and payments must be made into the following account:

Account holder: Leo Archer CC
Bank: Standard Bank
Branch: Sandton (019 205)
Account number: 42 096 219 0

Very important: Please include a payment reference using the following format: First_initial Last_name C/J (depending on whether you are attending the Cape Town or Joburg event)

Nokia is planning to step aside as market leader

December 8th, 2008 Comments

Nokia logo.pngNokia’s insistence on supporting Windows almost exclusively is a sure recipe for disaster. While I understand that Windows is still on the majority of computers around the world, the longer Nokia ignores the Mac OS and Linux, the closer it will come to giving up its place as market leader to Apple or the Linux-based mobile device market in the next few years.

You don’t have to look very far to see challenges to Nokia’s dominance and those challenges are coming from platforms not dependent on Windows. The iPhone is a runaway success for Apple and it is swiftly becoming the consumer’s mobile phone/media device/tablet of choice. Granted it only runs on the Mac OS and connects to iTunes running on Windows, it still covers a significant majority of computer users. Its challenges include high prices and limited features and functionality.

On the other end of the spectrum we are going to see a variety of Linux based devices emerge with even more user friendly interfaces. Android holds a tremendous amount of promise and it is only a matter of time before the OS and the devices themselves comfortably rival Nokia’s devices and without the Windows dependency. Canonical is also working on a version of Ubuntu for Mobile Internet Devices.

Nokia’s Windows-centric focus serves Windows users well but its aversion to meaningful Mac OS support does not endear it to Mac users who seem to be expected to be grateful at the thought of a Mac version of smaller applications.

I have been a Nokia user for as long as I have had a mobile phone (roughly a decade) and for the most part it has been a positive experience. However, the days of being content with what is available are over and I want more options. I am a Mac user and I am tired of being penalised for that. I am not going to jump the fence for the iPhone for reasons I have mentioned here before. My E71 is a fantastic phone so I remain a fan, for the time being. At the same time I am keeping an eye on Android and Ubuntu MID. The day may soon come where those two platforms (or some other platform) becomes mature enough to support my needs and allow me to expand them as I go. At that point Nokia will be hard pressed to retain me as a loyal user if it hasn’t stepped up by then.

And you know what? I am not the only person who feels this way.

Technorati Tags:
, , , , , , ,

My unexpected business case for remaining in South Africa

September 4th, 2008 Comments

I was a panelist at last night’s Epiphany event titled “The unexpected business case for remaining in South Africa” moderated by David Donde. The other panelists were Mike Stopforth, Joshin Raghubar and Branko Brkic (Branko wasn’t feeling well and had to excuse himself at the beginning of a fascinating presentation).

Epiphany 1 @ the Sandton Sun - 3 September 2008 - 4

I created a video out of my presentation slides and a voice overlay which I added this morning for anyone who would like to watch my presentation. The voice overlay is pretty much what I spoke about during my presentation, includes a few ideas that went around during the discussion that followed the presentations and a couple other thoughts I have had. It runs to about 12 minutes and I have also posted it to my Facebook page (feel free to wonder over there, become a fan, start a discussion or just post a pithy thought to the Page Wall).

I enjoyed listening to a number of pretty passionate people talking about how we can make a difference in South Africa. There was a fair amount of debate about who bears the responsibility for helping to bring about the change we seek. It was pretty sobering to see all the people who have been seriously considering leaving the country although that should be placed into perspective. One member of the audience made a good point about people leaving the country: there are many people who are returning or who are looking to create a new life here, whether they are coming from Africa or Europe and North America.

It was a fantastic opportunity being on the panel. Thanks for Max Kaizen and David for the invitation. If you are interested in continuing the conversation (or perhaps starting a new one), head over to the Epiphany network and dive in.

Update: Take a look at Nic Haralambous’ post here.

Technorati Tags:
, , , , , , , , , ,

Lawyers are LinkedIn to each other more and more

June 24th, 2008 Comments

LinkedIn_logo_119x32.gifThere is a debate about LinkedIn’s utility in the face of apparently growing numbers of lawyers joining and maintaining profiles on the service on Lexblog and Home Office Lawyer. This debate comes at a good time for me because I have been ruminating on LinkedIn’s value to me as a business networking tool the last week or so. My first thought is to ditch my free, personal account armbands and swim out into the deeper and potentially more rewarding paid, business account waters. At the same time I do want to see clear potential for value.

The first thing I did was to post a question on LinkedIn and on this blog about 4 days ago:

I’ve started thinking about upgrading my account from a free personal account to a paid business account. The business accounts offer quite a bit more than the personal account. My question to myself is whether I am using LinkedIn enough to justify the $19.95 per month (or even the $199.50 per year). What I would really like to see is a post or discussion about the value of a business account and what difference it makes to a user. Do I need to be a power user to benefit from a business account? Is the correct question even whether I am using it enough to justify the upgrade? Should it be more about upgrading and reaping the rewards?

In that time I didn’t receive any comments on my blog and received 5 responses on LinkedIn (not counting further interaction when I responded to the initial responses). That already says something about LinkedIn’s value to me as a networking/information/knowledge tool. If one of the goals of a service like LinkedIn and tools like blogs is to facilitate a conversation then LinkedIn is already ahead of the game. To add to this, I think it is fair to say that my blog has more traffic than my LinkedIn profile and this only enhances my LinkedIn profile’s value from this perspective. Of course there are a range of dynamics which impact on my rough analysis so it is hardly bulletproof.


Image: lawyers by Wrote licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 license

Anyway, I am really curious about how I can make the most of LinkedIn and how I can use it to meaningfully expand my business network. I am not talking about adding a list of names (although I have done that to a degree) but rather how I can add a list of names to my list of connections and still have some meaningful interaction with those people, whether it be some form of work or just getting to know that person a little bit better.

A couple of the people who responded to my question on LinkedIn said that for $19.95, it is worth upgrading to the business account and trying it out. The one big benefit that I can see is that it is a lot easier for people to contact me if I have a business account because of the InMail feature. I am still a little nonplussed with a model that charges for the privilege of contacting another member I am not connected to although I am beginning to understand the value of not being freely contactable by everyone (thinking about Facebook and the regular message/invite/ninja-pirate hybrid app inundation I experience on Facebook). I have been a bit of an idiot when I have thought about the value of a paid account and this is reflected in the previous sentence. Limiting direct contact to paying members must, in part, deter Facebook-style floods of inane messages. What is probably more valuable is the ability to contact someone directly (whether you are the premium subscriber looking to make contact with a potential business partner/customer for the first time or you would like to contact a premium subscriber directly for similar reasons). Making this possible through a paid service at least means that you, as the paid subscriber, are serious about making meaningful contacts and that already enhances the value of the service all around, don’t you think? The value of a paid account beyond this seems to be to make LinkedIn a more comprehensive research tool and that could come in handy too if the results are better than results from a free account search. I am already using LinkedIn as a research tool when I encounter someone new or I am looking to contact someone new. The one little thing holding me back from taking the leap is the fact that I can’t simply downgrade to a personal account from a business account by selecting the option in my account settings. I have to email customer service to downgrade. That doesn’t sound too bad except I mailed customer service with a couple queries about the upgrade a couple days ago and haven’t received a response yet. How long would I have to wait to downgrade from a paid service to the free service before customer service agents act on my request and, consequentially, how long would I have to wait before LinkedIn stops charging me?

Leaving slow response times aside I am still pretty keen to explore LinkedIn some more and develop the habit of using it more and more. There are already a number of South Africans using LinkedIn (there are in excess of 19 000 people in my extended network in Johannesburg alone)

LinkedIn network stats.png

I ran a search on the number of people who are in South Africa and who have listed “Legal Services” or “Legal Practice” as their industry type and came up with about 500 people in my network (as I understand it, my network includes people up to 3 degrees away from me). I was quite pleased to see I am at the top of that list but who’s counting anyway. I am connected to the first 10 people or so already on that list. There is definitely a user base in South Africa already even if many of the profiles on LinkedIn are not maintained. This translates into enough potential to merit using the service. I think I agree with Maxwell Kennerly that LinkedIn’s value is not readily quantifiable either in money terms or any other measure that amounts to a return on investment in the service. As with many social networking tools, the value is a little fuzzy and yet it quite clearly exists (although you may still need to work for it).

Just the same it would be great if someone from LinkedIn’s customer service department responded to my query …

Technorati Tags:
, , , , ,

Doesn’t take a genius

June 21st, 2008 Comments

Mike thinks we need to give local business portal, MyGenius, another look. Despite the fact that MyGenius is how I first connected with Mike, my preference at the moment is to find a convenient way to delete my account on MyGenius or just deal with the mail I get from time to time from the service. I am sure a good number of people benefit greatly from MyGenius but it just doesn’t rev my engine all that much.

I don’t remember how I came across MyGenius but I thought it would be worth a try. I have been a member of a pretty successful business network called Business Warriors for quite some time now and I have had good results from that service despite it being based on a very old style forum (sometimes those old ideas and platforms work well). What made a big difference in Business Warriors wasn’t so much the forum discussions, it was the simplicity and the personal contact with other members.

MyGenius has a really cool looking interface compared to Business Warriors and appears to have so much more functionality. What I noticed early on is how closed the environment is. There isn’t (or wasn’t the last time I took a look) an opportunity to plug my external blog and other content into my MyGenius profile. All my MyGenius related content must be created within and is stored within MyGenius.

MyGenius front page.png

Mike made an interesting comment about MyGenius:

I recently did a show on CNBC Africa about the power of social networking for entrepreneurs and the producers of the show used MyGenius as a case study, not LinkedIn. Why? It’s accessible and easy to understand for the 2.0-uninitiated. What we Web 2.0 enthusiasts sometimes see as being current, sexy and improtant may seem totally of the wall and inaccessible to the layman. I liken this to the fashion industry. All fashion shows I see on TV seem excessive and weird to me. I don’t get it at all and would feel like completely out at such an event. It’s the same with the sites we use and build. We assume ‘normal’ Web users see things like we do – are drawn to the same things we are. This is simply not the case, hence why MyGenius is getting users that LinkedIn simply ain’t.

A cursory look at MyGenius reveals a different story. MyGenius’ appeal is its fancy functionality. It is loaded with an array of pseudo-Web 2.0 functionality (although there is an apparent misunderstanding of some basic Web 2.0 elements – what is supposed to be a blog is really a kind of message board).

MyGenius blog.png

MyGenius tries to leverage off the social media revolution that has been sweeping the local Web. What you get, though, is a pretty busy interface that is closer to a pre-Web 2.0 site than a functional and effective social media powered website. Of course it is a little inaccurate to talk about whether a site is a Web 2.0 site or not. Web 2.0 is about sharing and connecting, not to mention a ground up approach to business interaction on the Web. MyGenius does do some of this despite its message based model with its clubs, meeting co-ordination and basic blogs. Despite all this functionality all the site succeeds at from my perspective is that it is a really busy site with not a lot of depth. MyGenius doesn’t do it for me. That is why I haven’t been paying it all that much attention lately and why I don’t intend spending all that much time on the site.

I am pretty excited about exploring LinkedIn further and I already connect to my business contacts on Plaxo Pulse. I don’t need another social networking site for business that doesn’t bring anything really innovative to the party.

Technorati Tags:
, , , , , , ,

SA Blook: Chapter 5, SA Inc and the business of doing business in SA

June 2nd, 2008 Comments

blooks2.jpg

Ramble on

A complete treatment of this topic would probably take up a number of hefty volumes so this chapter is not intended to cover all aspects of doing business in South Africa. There are many brilliant, knowledgeable and expert writers and professionals in South Africa who could speak far more authoritatively on the range of topics that fall under the general header of “SA Inc and the business of doing business in South Africa”.

Instead I am going to mention two topics which I am both passionate about, regard as two very hot topics in the near future and which are, themselves, are subjects of entire books and which SA Business should bear in mind when doing business in South Africa: privacy and content licensing. These topics are going to be of interest for those businesses which are interested in or involved in the growing social media space.

While content licensing and privacy are the topics that tend to attract the most attention when I chat to business people about them, freedom of expression and unlawful competition are two topics I won’t deal with in this chapter due to space considerations in the context of this blook as a whole but which are arguably equally important. Which topics are more relevant and therefore important to you may be a matter of perspective depending on what your focus may be at a given point in time.

Privacy

Privacy has always been an issue business has had to tackle although not terribly vigorously. Privacy issues in the workplace have often included personal communications and personal relationships in the workplace and have been dealt with through internal policies on issues ranging from the acceptable use of the organisation’s IT infrastructure to policies that deal with the prickly topic of sexual harassment.

The need to give substance to the right to privacy in the Bill of Rights and the increasing amount of personal information that is becoming available both online and offline in all spheres (and the growing need to safeguard that potentially sensitive information) have given rise to draft legislation presently doing the rounds in our legislature.

This is not a new process and in many ways the draft legislation mirrors developments abroad, including in the European Union. Without going into the legislation in much detail (yet another volume in itself), it defines personal information and through a series of voluntary and mandatory mechanisms it seeks to strike a balance between the need to safeguard personal information when processed by public (for example, government bodies) and private (for example, businesses) bodies, the need to protect and give substance to the right to privacy and the desire to facilitate the appropriate flow of personal information.

I use an extract from the draft legislation in a presentation I give on these topics and in which I highlight some of the examples of personal information. Although few people can actually read the extract in the slide because the font is so small, the highlights demonstrate the fairly broad scope of the definition and highlight the need to take a more active interest in how this draft legislation may impact on South African businesses.

An unfortunate consequence of a growing complexity of issues pertinent to business is that it is necessary to introduce a range of measures to reduce and manage the risks that accompany this growing complexity. One of these measures, at least in this context, is a clear privacy policy that informs both internal stakeholders and customers what personal information the company is collecting and how that personal information is being used. These uses are guided by the draft legislation and it is vital that this information be communicated to these people.

The draft legislation also envisages imposing a series of obligations on businesses to secure their stores of personal information and to retain that personal information subject to specified guidelines. Add a range of exemptions and prohibitions to the mix and businesses are facing a far more complex privacy landscape which needs to be navigated with considerable care.

Bottom line: things are about to become really interesting in this space.

Content licensing

For the most part Business SA either doesn’t think too much about copyright or views it as a shield to protect it from the horrors that ravage the intellectual property countryside that include plagiarists and unimaginative bloggers who are too loose with the “Copy” and “Paste” commands.

Copyright certainly has a valuable place in that intellectual property countryside. One of its most important functions is to protect original content and, in the process, it encourages content creators to develop more original content. The difficulty with copyright is that, as a bundle of exclusive rights, it does not always fit in well with the growing social media trend (if you can call it that) and with consumers’ desires and habits.

One question I often ask people is how many of them tend to download or copy interesting content they see on the Web without thinking too much about little things like who owns the copyright in that content and whether consuming that content in that way is consistent with the copyright owner’s intentions and rights. At the risk of oversimplifying the issues, people want to go online and freely share what they find with their friends, family and colleagues. This act of sharing often takes the form of copied text and images being distributed by email, printed out and passed around or even incorporated into blogs and other online social media platforms.

The problem with this tendency, of course, is that many of these uses are forms of copyright infringement and while there are a number of exceptions to general copyright infringement the exceptions themselves are sometimes not terribly clear or helpful.

There is an alternative to simply relying on the protections afforded by copyright and its exceptions to copyright infringement. If your goal, as a content creator, is to ensure that your content is made available to the biggest audience possible within certain parameters which may protect your business model, the integrity of your content or ensure that any sharing perpetuates your open access ambitions then you will be thinking about some form of license for your content. The immediate challenge is how to properly license your content and make sure that the considerations that need to be addressed are, in fact addressed.

One option is to go to an attorney have have a custom made license prepared. A license will grant its user certain rights in the content concerned which, in turn, will enable the user to make use of the content in a way that would ordinarily be prohibited. This has its advantages because you will have a license that does exactly what you want it to do (that is, permit certain uses and prohibit others). The disadvantages include the costs involved and the possible inability to understand the terms of the license unless you have degrees in Latin and advanced legalese.

cc.large.pngThe second option will be far more appealing to many content creators. Creative Commons licenses are ready made content licences that permit a range of uses of content depending on the license adopted (there are six core licenses). These licenses are customisable to a degree in that you can choose which elements to include in your license to supplement elements that are built into every Creative Commons license, such as the ability to share the content privately, the requirement that authors of the content concerned be attributed properly and the perpetual term of the licenses. The rights granted by a Creative Commons license may include the ability to create a derivative work of the content (something like a remix of a song, perhaps?), the right to exploit a work commercially or perhaps the requirement that adaptations of the content be distributed under a similar Creative Commons license.

One thing for SA Business to bear in mind, especially in the push to integrate social media into an online presence, is that Creative Commons licenses can be powerful tools which can be used to help spread content as widely as possible. This makes a lot of sense where a business has a blog or otherwise publishes its content on the Web with the intention that it reach as many people as possible. Additional protocols like the recently introduced CC+ protocol enable businesses to integrate their commercial licenses into a non-commercial Cretive Commons license. One benefit of this is to present a licensed version of the content that can be freely shared while preserving a commercial model. A good example of a service that uses a similar model is the popular tutorial service, Common Craft.

What I constantly find remarkable about these legal constructs is the very real impact they can have on creative expression. Although copyright was originally intended to protect and promote creative expression, it has become almost synonymous with protectionism and restrictions on content usage. It is unfortunate but it has paved the way for tools like Creative Commons licenses and similar free content licenses to free content creators to express themselves more freely secure in the knowledge that they have struck a balance between sharing and spreading their ideas and passions and, at the same time, ensuring that their content is used in a way that best achieves that expression. Just what form that expression takes and how it manifests will vary from one content creator to another, whether that content creator be an artist, a writer or Chief Executive blogging about his hopes and dreams for his company.

Levelling off

Without a doubt privacy and content licensing are critical issues that SA Business needs to pay careful attention to, especially as more and more local businesses provide services and publish content online. Two topics I wasn’t able to deal with in this chapter introduce further dimensions of complexity and perhaps greater challenges for many businesses: freedom of expression and unlawful competition. These seemingly unrelated topics come together in a very interesting and yet somewhat disturbing way for many businesses in the context of social media in particular and also merit very careful consideration.

One message I try to communicate whenever I speak about these topics is that as much as they may complicate an already confusing landscape, the risks they represent can (and should) be managed and, in the process, reduced. Doing so requires a little research and planning but the benefits of these foundational steps will soon become apparent in a variety of ways, all of which add to the tremendous promise and potential of doing business in South Africa.

Now read the rest of the blook chapters:

Introduction
1. The new South Africa – is it real?
2. Is SA rich or poor?
3. What the world thinks of South Africa and what our global opportunities are
4. The importance of each individual’s contribution collectively
5. SA Inc and the business of doing business in SA
6. The beauty and grandeur that surrounds us
7. The importance of technology in SA’s global emergence
8. Building brand South Africa
9. Making the most of SA’s creative talents and abilities
10. Innovate for a better South Africa
11. The role of the younger generation in SA, and what we need to do to support them
12. Connecting South Africa – Communities that transcend technology
13. We are African – the role of collaboration in South Africa’s growth


Creative Commons License
Chapter 5, SA Inc and the business of doing business in SA by Paul Jacobson is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 South Africa License.
Based on a work at pauljacobson.org.


Technorati Tags:
, , , , , , , , ,

Failed South African government

January 19th, 2008 Comments

It should be abundantly clear that the South African government has failed after just a decade and a half at the helm. Sure our finance ministers have come up with fairly effective fiscal policies but these policies have really just delayed the inevitable. To quote Ivo in his recent post titled “Vindication for the racists“:

The doomsayers weren’t right because blacks can’t run a country. Alec Erwin, the minister of public enterprises (who famously said “sabotage is everywhere” before saying “human instrumentality” would be a better term) is white as the driven snow. The doomsayers were right because a motley collection of communists, unionists, socialists and Keynesian statists can’t run a country.

If you’re looking for evidence, you need look no further than lousy service delivery to under-serviced areas, unacceptably high crime levels (especially in light of a clearly dodgy national police commissioner charged with numerous counts of corruption, fraud, racketeering and defeating the course of justice), law enforcement bodies that display a disregard for the judiciary and the rule of law, rising interest rates that are squeezing the lower and middle income earners really hard and, my personal favourite, rolling power blackouts (aka load shedding).

The electricity crisis, alone, is cause to fire the government and the Eskom executive. How could they not have seen the demand for electricity increase to the point where more capacity would be required. How could existing infrastructure be allowed to fall into disrepair? What a group of incompetent morons! To make matters worse I keep hearing stories about how certain areas designated as ANC strongholds and areas where ANC bigwigs live don’t experience power failures at all. So now the crisis that grips this country is also being manipulated for political purposes? WTF?

So here’s the deal. Government can’t run its own household so we have three options. We can wait for the government to sort itself out and pull a small nuclear power station out of a hat in less than 6 months (yeah, about the same chance of me becoming President in 2009); we can leave the country (this latest crisis makes that a really tempting option for me) or we can do it ourselves. I have been tending towards citizens doing it for themselves for a while now because the structures that are supposed to take care of these basic things are either inept, disempowered or corrupt.

For now I am going with door number 3. When it comes to working around load shedding there are a couple avenues to explore. The first is to take a serious look at municpal gas where this is available. We had gas in our last home and it was far cheaper than electricity and far more reliable. Consider installing a gas infrastructure into your home and run your stove/oven and hot water supply on gas. I am interested in other sorts of gas appliances like lighting and perhaps even some sort of generator. The initial outlay can be expensive if you have to have a new installation done and still have to buy the appliances but consider spending 5 years with daily blackouts (possibly escalating as the national batteries run dry).

Two other options I haven’t seen much talk about locally are solar or geothermal power. Are these systems available in South Africa? If not, can they be imported? What are the costs involved? What is enough people wanted them, would that create a market here and bring prices down? Has anyone investigated this? Maybe it is time to stop waiting for some faceless person to stop passing the buck and citizens should come together and organise this themselves. I came across a local guy who has been developing pretty efficient solar panels. He told me that a decent sized array could power a neighbourhood. Now that sounds like an option to me. Switch off the Eskom plug, bring power back to the people (now, if the DA was smart it should look into facilitating this in rural and urban areas).

There is a frenzy in the diesel/petrol generator market but this option is expensive. The generators themselves are pricey and the fuel is expensive and will only become more expensive as the oil price continues to rise.

So sadly the South African government has failed. There is no light at the end of the tunnel for the government because the same bunch of nitwits will remain in power (excuse the pun) for the foreseeable future. That doesn’t mean South Africans can start doing it for themselves and take care of what the government clearly can’t or won’t do.

Update: Since no-one really pays attention to what I write here, take a look at Justin’s post

Technorati Tags:
, , , , , , , , ,