Search this site
Facebook

Twitter
Photo stream
Navigation
Powered by Squarespace
« Blog Marketing | Main | Download video in Firefox … almost all of it! »

Insurance policy applications: don’t hold back


You may have noticed that when you apply for an insurance policy you are asked quite a few questions about your health, occupation, leisure activities and even your shoe size!  When you complete these forms it is important to be completely honest and not to answer in any misleading way.  It is equally important to disclose information which may be relevant to the insurance company even if you are not asked.  The reason for this is that a failure to disclose something which has a material impact on the assessment of your application and/or the premiums you will be paying can be grounds for the insurance company to repudiate your insurance policy when you need it most; at claim stage.


Discuss your application with your financial advisor but be sure to answer the questions honestly and complete the form correctly.  I was involved in a case a few years ago where the life assured's broker didn't think it relevant to mention his client's diabetes in the application form and when the life assured filed a claim and my client, the insurance company, discovered the omission, my client repudiated on the basis that the omission was highly material and would most certainly have had an impact on whether the life assured would have been granted cover and the premium that would have been charged.  The fact that his advisor didn't think it necessary to disclose the condition didn't save him.  He lost an expensive law suit and his chances of benefitting from his insurance cover.


Technorati Tags: , , ,

Reader Comments (8)

i would like to know what case you referred to and if there are other cases on point. my opinion on this situation is that, due to the fact that the agent felt that the information is not applicable and that it should be entered on the proposal form, the insurance company should be liable due to its agents act.

Apr 26, 2007 at 21:18 | Unregistered CommenterRonelle

i would like to know what case you referred to and if there are other cases on point. my opinion on this situation is that, due to the fact that the agent felt that the information is not applicable and that it should be entered on the proposal form, the insurance company should be liable due to its agents act.

Apr 26, 2007 at 21:18 | Unregistered CommenterRonelle

i would like to know what case you referred to and if there are other cases on point. my opinion on this situation is that, due to the fact that the agent felt that the information is not applicable and that it should be entered on the proposal form, the insurance company should be liable due to its agents act.

Apr 26, 2007 at 21:18 | Unregistered CommenterRonelle

We looked at this issue a couple years ago and the answer really depended on who the broker was working for. If the broker was an independent agent then he/she would be regarded as the insured's agent and the insured would be responsible for the broker's conduct. If the broker was employed by the insurer then the insurer is probably on the hook.

Apr 28, 2007 at 9:14 | Unregistered CommenterPaul

We looked at this issue a couple years ago and the answer really depended on who the broker was working for. If the broker was an independent agent then he/she would be regarded as the insured's agent and the insured would be responsible for the broker's conduct. If the broker was employed by the insurer then the insurer is probably on the hook.

Apr 28, 2007 at 9:14 | Unregistered CommenterPaul

We looked at this issue a couple years ago and the answer really depended on who the broker was working for. If the broker was an independent agent then he/she would be regarded as the insured's agent and the insured would be responsible for the broker's conduct. If the broker was employed by the insurer then the insurer is probably on the hook.

Apr 28, 2007 at 9:14 | Unregistered CommenterPaul

We looked at this issue a couple years ago and the answer really depended on who the broker was working for. If the broker was an independent agent then he/she would be regarded as the insured's agent and the insured would be responsible for the broker's conduct. If the broker was employed by the insurer then the insurer is probably on the hook.

Apr 28, 2007 at 9:14 | Unregistered CommenterPaul

The truth is that people have addictions and that is not always a bad thing. Internet is surely not among the addictions someone should worry about. It's a great way to spend your time. The messy part about internet addiction has been created by parents upset that their kids spend way too much time playing games instead of learning or reading something useful. These days it's internet, 30 years ago it was football but I didn't hear about any football rehab

Nov 3, 2009 at 16:29 | Unregistered CommenterDarcyKitchin

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>