Comments on: Is Gizmodo more about sensationalism than quality reporting?

By: Nokia Geek

Nokia Geek — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:08:19 +0000

Paul, ok, reading your other blog postings I realize that some Gizmodo editors will not publish reader comments that would show the editor’s own lack of knowledge. The editors are not just being incompetent but also dishonest. Matt Buchanan’s N97 review struck me as a piece of propaganda. This raises the question how reliable are Gizmodo reviews in general.

By: Nokia Geek

Nokia Geek — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:23:51 +0000

I posted yesterday a comment under the Gizmodo Samsung Omnia HD I8910 review where I criticized the ignorance of the Gizmodo editors about the multitasking ability of Symbian S60. My comment has not been published yet.

Does Gizmodo have a biased publishing policy of comments?

By: jay lee

jay lee — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:05:05 +0000

at least his sites got readers, your just basically piggy backing on the topic.

uselss half ass blog lol

By: Jaimal

Jaimal — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:53:00 +0000

@Paul Your comment was on par, the immature can’t handle the truth nor can they admit fault!

By: Marius

Marius — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:04:55 +0000

Paul, I agree so with you. This is the case for all thing American when reporting on non-American product. It is not an iPhone so we dare not like it.

I have the same issue with Paul Thurrott who writes about Microsoft stuff and he is so one eyed and anti Linux/Mac/Google.