Home > Companies, Mobile Tech > Google Latitude shows you where your friends are

Google Latitude shows you where your friends are

February 4th, 2009 Leave a comment Go to comments

Google just launched a really interesting service called Latitude. At first I thought it is a new service entirely but I soon realised this is an improvement to Google Maps for mobile devices which will give privacy advocates many sleepless nights. So what is Google Latitude? It is a mobile product that integrates with Google Maps and your contacts list in your Gmail account. The combination is a service that shows you where your friends are and what they are doing. Latitude also gives you the ability to contact your friends through sms and IM or by phone.

There are a number of safeguards built into the service to protect both your privacy and your friends’ privacy. For starters it is an opt-in service so you have to take a positive step to activate the service and have control over whether you disclose your location or not. Although you can add your friends from your contacts list (the one option is to add your whole contacts list in one go so be prepared!), it appears they have to approve your request to add them.

jaikunew.PNGAnother feature of the service is status updates … this is all probably beginning to sound familiar to users of another service which was developed by some of Latitude’s developers: Jaiku! Jyri Engeström, one of Jaiku’s founders, was involved in Latitude’s developments and told me this morning that some of his former Jaiku development team were involved in Latitude’s development. This answers a question I have had about what the Jaiku team have been doing since Google acquired Jaiku a while ago. I was really disappointed to see that Jaiku wasn’t being as actively maintained and that it wasn’t integrated into Android but I can see what Google was up to. Smart even if it did take Google a while to get this going.

The screenshots are based on an Android device/iPhone so I don’t know what the contacts list within the new Google Maps looks like. I also haven’t added any friends yet either. This is a product you should only really use with people you know because if your device is GPS enabled, your friends can see precisely where you are.

Latitude also integrates into a Google Gadget which you can add to iGoogle and I wouldn’t be surprised to see integration with Google Maps (online) and even Google Earth at some point. This service becomes really powerful when combined with other map data like restaurants and other social spots. This is what location-based service advocates have been talking about for some time now. It also makes it even more important to have better map data in countries like South Africa if we are going to enjoy the full benefits of this service.

Some of you are probably thinking that this isn’t new. The Grid already some some of this functionality, as do a couple other services around the Web like Fire Eagle. The service that probably comes closest to Latitude is Nokia’s Friend View but that is obviously limited to certain Nokia devices (Latitude works with a broader range of devices).

As with anything Google, it is still significant when Google gets involved in a space but it remains to be seen which service will prove most successful. Given the prevalence of Google Maps on iPhones, Android devices and a large number of other mobile devices, it doesn’t take a lot to introduce all these users to Latitude. It takes an upgrade to a service they already use and trust. GPS integration is going to make a big difference here.

Let me know what you think about the service?

Technorati Tags:
, , , ,

Related posts:

  1. Google Maps Mobile
  2. Wild thoughts about the Google Social Net
  3. Hey N97, let’s be friends (its not me, its you)
  4. Google Maps South Africa launch
  5. Google Sync overtakes MobileMe, Ovi and others

Categories: Companies, Mobile Tech Tags:
  • this looks like CIA tool
  • It would be kind of cool for figuring out where your friends are at. How cool would it be to be taking a taxi in NYC, check your phone and see your friends are in a bar just up the street, stop in and join them! Sweet

    I think you can cloak your location if you do not want others to see your location, i.e.. if you are studying for an exam or on a date with someone else! Bad!
  • Hey Roy, maybe a harsher tone has its place too? Feeling a need for something a little edgier in the local scene lately ...

    Sue, talks at 27 Dinners have been great. Not all of them, but some have been. If the standard is raised and speakers are required to really present something good, the talks about turn a social dinner thing into something easily worth the time and Primi cost.
  • Mmk, I've never been to one of the 27Dinners but *perhaps* there shouldn't be a talk at all!

    Perhaps it should just be about DINNER and a fun, social atmosphere ...?

    It seems to me that all these "talks" everyone goes to means everyone feels obliged to always wear their "I'm such a friggin' genius" mask.

    I may way off base here but I would really love to go to a "do" that's just about meeting real people.
  • Mmk, I've never been to one of the 27Dinners but *perhaps* there shouldn't be a talk at all!

    Perhaps it should just be about DINNER and a fun, social atmosphere ...?

    It seems to me that all these "talks" everyone goes to means everyone feels obliged to always wear their "I'm such a friggin' genius" mask.

    I may way off base here but I would really love to go to a "do" that's just about meeting real people.
  • Hiya Paul...

    Oooo! I absolutely have NOT retracted a single thing I said in the original comment/critique! As Vince said, my apology was an adjustment. I have apologised for my offensive tone. Which I think is an appropriate thing to apologise for.

    Re the 27 Dinner talks... my critique holds. But there ARE ways to approach offering criticism. And I don't think it will be easy for people to TAKE my criticique the way it was presented by me.

    My aim in MAKING the critique in the first place was to offer my insight, and to make it useful, so that improvements could take place. What use is criticism if all it does is stir anger?

    As for bloggers being up their own butts... the tone of my comment revealed to me that I was up my own butt too. The apology is my attempt at yanking myself out of my butt by my own bootstraps. Buttstraps.

    Blue skies
    love
    Roy
  • Hiya Paul...

    Oooo! I absolutely have NOT retracted a single thing I said in the original comment/critique! As Vince said, my apology was an adjustment. I have apologised for my offensive tone. Which I think is an appropriate thing to apologise for.

    Re the 27 Dinner talks... my critique holds. But there ARE ways to approach offering criticism. And I don't think it will be easy for people to TAKE my criticique the way it was presented by me.

    My aim in MAKING the critique in the first place was to offer my insight, and to make it useful, so that improvements could take place. What use is criticism if all it does is stir anger?

    As for bloggers being up their own butts... the tone of my comment revealed to me that I was up my own butt too. The apology is my attempt at yanking myself out of my butt by my own bootstraps. Buttstraps.

    Blue skies
    love
    Roy
  • Hi Paul. After deciding a long time ago to follow pinbacks on my site, the very dubious and ominous Moral Fibre I've arrived here.

    No comment about moi? How sad! To the point of Roy's Retraction, I think it isn't so much a retraction as it is an adjustment; Mike and Roy know one another and I think that the internet isn't always the easiest space in which to build upon positive criticism as it is a communicative space sans tone / voice / gesticulation etc. etc.

    Your point on the fear of "authenticity" is a juicy topic you should have explored more thoroughly, I'm inclined to agree with you for the most part the South African blogosphere is littered with masks laying disused after they've become redundant. I make the point of using Masks as I'm reminded of Fanon's writings in "black skins white masks", it is a covering which protects and serves the wearer in a society which looks upon that particular individual with suspicion. I'm sure loads of bloggers are saying, "fuck thats me, no one understands me". Tears, snot, self-love etc. I think what is most likely happening is that the blogging space is so competitive that individuals are putting on fronts, creating online personas which are far more glorious than their real-life symbiotic counterparts.

    Take for instance those bloggers entitled "thought-leaders" who are precariously perched on the top of the blogosphere, imagine one of them saying "wait a moment this high horse is making my arse numb, I think I'd prefer to walk" unbloody likely right? So now imagine the group of bloggers in attendance at the 27 dinner turning to one another and saying, "who are you, really?"..perhaps even less likely.

    Its a long comment so perhaps you should continue in a real blog, because now you've got my attention, and I'm famous...in margate..Whats that? I think I hear my high-horse calling, the ivory tower calls .
  • Hi Paul. After deciding a long time ago to follow pinbacks on my site, the very dubious and ominous Moral Fibre I've arrived here.

    No comment about moi? How sad! To the point of Roy's Retraction, I think it isn't so much a retraction as it is an adjustment; Mike and Roy know one another and I think that the internet isn't always the easiest space in which to build upon positive criticism as it is a communicative space sans tone / voice / gesticulation etc. etc.

    Your point on the fear of "authenticity" is a juicy topic you should have explored more thoroughly, I'm inclined to agree with you for the most part the South African blogosphere is littered with masks laying disused after they've become redundant. I make the point of using Masks as I'm reminded of Fanon's writings in "black skins white masks", it is a covering which protects and serves the wearer in a society which looks upon that particular individual with suspicion. I'm sure loads of bloggers are saying, "fuck thats me, no one understands me". Tears, snot, self-love etc. I think what is most likely happening is that the blogging space is so competitive that individuals are putting on fronts, creating online personas which are far more glorious than their real-life symbiotic counterparts.

    Take for instance those bloggers entitled "thought-leaders" who are precariously perched on the top of the blogosphere, imagine one of them saying "wait a moment this high horse is making my arse numb, I think I'd prefer to walk" unbloody likely right? So now imagine the group of bloggers in attendance at the 27 dinner turning to one another and saying, "who are you, really?"..perhaps even less likely.

    Its a long comment so perhaps you should continue in a real blog, because now you've got my attention, and I'm famous...in margate..Whats that? I think I hear my high-horse calling, the ivory tower calls .
blog comments powered by Disqus