<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Donn Edwards settles defamation case with Quality Vacation Club</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pauljacobson.org/2009/01/14/donn-edwards-settles-defamation-case-with-quality-vacation-club/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2009/01/14/donn-edwards-settles-defamation-case-with-quality-vacation-club/</link>
	<description>blogger.  evangelist.  maven.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:14:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RV Reviews</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2009/01/14/donn-edwards-settles-defamation-case-with-quality-vacation-club/comment-page-1/#comment-5029</link>
		<dc:creator>RV Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=2654#comment-5029</guid>
		<description>hope they will be able to settle this thing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hope they will be able to settle this thing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcel</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2009/01/14/donn-edwards-settles-defamation-case-with-quality-vacation-club/comment-page-1/#comment-3454</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=2654#comment-3454</guid>
		<description>Thank you for giving us the process answer &amp; I don&#039;t like it either.  It sounds like a scare tactic &amp; the problem is that we, as bloggers, cannot push this forward without Donn.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here&#039;s the thing - if a consumer advocate like ol&#039; Isabel Jones had written about this, would QVC settled with the same terms?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Well, Isabel, you need to print a retracting - while you&#039;re at it, you can&#039;t write about us for 5 years.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t think so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other hand, QVC&#039;s past behaviour doesn&#039;t create the trust I need to ensure that they&#039;re not going to do it again. It just means that Donn can&#039;t do anything about it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the end, the damage done to QVC online may be a just retribution.  (Unless they use &#039;Black Hat SEO&#039; to fix up the problem.)  They still haven&#039;t solved all their problems on Hello Peter ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for giving us the process answer &#038; I don&#39;t like it either.  It sounds like a scare tactic &#038; the problem is that we, as bloggers, cannot push this forward without Donn.  </p>
<p>Here&#39;s the thing &#8211; if a consumer advocate like ol&#39; Isabel Jones had written about this, would QVC settled with the same terms?</p>
<p>&#8220;Well, Isabel, you need to print a retracting &#8211; while you&#39;re at it, you can&#39;t write about us for 5 years.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#39;t think so.</p>
<p>On the other hand, QVC&#39;s past behaviour doesn&#39;t create the trust I need to ensure that they&#39;re not going to do it again. It just means that Donn can&#39;t do anything about it.</p>
<p>In the end, the damage done to QVC online may be a just retribution.  (Unless they use &#39;Black Hat SEO&#39; to fix up the problem.)  They still haven&#39;t solved all their problems on Hello Peter &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
