<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts about video blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pauljacobson.org/2008/07/15/thoughts-about-video-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2008/07/15/thoughts-about-video-blogging/</link>
	<description>blogger.  evangelist.  maven.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:31:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2008/07/15/thoughts-about-video-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-3208</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=2662#comment-3208</guid>
		<description>Lol.  Thanks for that one Saul!  I&#039;ll work on the costume for next time.

Seriously though, I dig the format.  It can be a bit dull watching myself but there is scope to work on that.  I&#039;ll keep working on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol.  Thanks for that one Saul!  I&#8217;ll work on the costume for next time.</p>
<p>Seriously though, I dig the format.  It can be a bit dull watching myself but there is scope to work on that.  I&#8217;ll keep working on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2008/07/15/thoughts-about-video-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-3209</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=2662#comment-3209</guid>
		<description>Lol.  Thanks for that one Saul!  I&#039;ll work on the costume for next time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seriously though, I dig the format.  It can be a bit dull watching myself but there is scope to work on that.  I&#039;ll keep working on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol.  Thanks for that one Saul!  I&#39;ll work on the costume for next time.</p>
<p>Seriously though, I dig the format.  It can be a bit dull watching myself but there is scope to work on that.  I&#39;ll keep working on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaulK</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2008/07/15/thoughts-about-video-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-3207</link>
		<dc:creator>SaulK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=2662#comment-3207</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a bit late on the take up here but let me throw in my two cents.
Firstly: loved the &quot;face for radio&quot; comment.
Secondly I&#039;m not sure what one can offer different via a vlog as opposed to a blog. Obviously it&#039;s more visual but if you need to demonstrate something you can always embed a video in your writen blog.

The thing is, the web is becoming more focused towards video but in my mind that&#039;s somewhat dumbing it down.
The truth is that I would have rather read your opinions or listened to them as a podcast because ultimately (and no offence Paul) staring at you is slightly... well.... dull.

I think vlogging has potential, I&#039;m just not sure where yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit late on the take up here but let me throw in my two cents.<br />
Firstly: loved the &#8220;face for radio&#8221; comment.<br />
Secondly I&#8217;m not sure what one can offer different via a vlog as opposed to a blog. Obviously it&#8217;s more visual but if you need to demonstrate something you can always embed a video in your writen blog.</p>
<p>The thing is, the web is becoming more focused towards video but in my mind that&#8217;s somewhat dumbing it down.<br />
The truth is that I would have rather read your opinions or listened to them as a podcast because ultimately (and no offence Paul) staring at you is slightly&#8230; well&#8230;. dull.</p>
<p>I think vlogging has potential, I&#8217;m just not sure where yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaulK</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2008/07/15/thoughts-about-video-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-3210</link>
		<dc:creator>SaulK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=2662#comment-3210</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a bit late on the take up here but let me throw in my two cents.&lt;br&gt;Firstly: loved the &quot;face for radio&quot; comment.&lt;br&gt;Secondly I&#039;m not sure what one can offer different via a vlog as opposed to a blog. Obviously it&#039;s more visual but if you need to demonstrate something you can always embed a video in your writen blog. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The thing is, the web is becoming more focused towards video but in my mind that&#039;s somewhat dumbing it down. &lt;br&gt;The truth is that I would have rather read your opinions or listened to them as a podcast because ultimately (and no offence Paul) staring at you is slightly... well.... dull. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think vlogging has potential, I&#039;m just not sure where yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m a bit late on the take up here but let me throw in my two cents.<br />Firstly: loved the &#8220;face for radio&#8221; comment.<br />Secondly I&#39;m not sure what one can offer different via a vlog as opposed to a blog. Obviously it&#39;s more visual but if you need to demonstrate something you can always embed a video in your writen blog. </p>
<p>The thing is, the web is becoming more focused towards video but in my mind that&#39;s somewhat dumbing it down. <br />The truth is that I would have rather read your opinions or listened to them as a podcast because ultimately (and no offence Paul) staring at you is slightly&#8230; well&#8230;. dull. </p>
<p>I think vlogging has potential, I&#39;m just not sure where yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2008/07/15/thoughts-about-video-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-3206</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=2662#comment-3206</guid>
		<description>Hey Sue

The video takes a little while to load, oddly.  At least the interface takes a few seconds to load up.  Once it does that you can play the video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Sue</p>
<p>The video takes a little while to load, oddly.  At least the interface takes a few seconds to load up.  Once it does that you can play the video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2008/07/15/thoughts-about-video-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-3211</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=2662#comment-3211</guid>
		<description>Hey Sue&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The video takes a little while to load, oddly.  At least the interface takes a few seconds to load up.  Once it does that you can play the video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Sue</p>
<p>The video takes a little while to load, oddly.  At least the interface takes a few seconds to load up.  Once it does that you can play the video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justBcoz</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2008/07/15/thoughts-about-video-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-3205</link>
		<dc:creator>justBcoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=2662#comment-3205</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this Paul - good food for thought.

I think a lot of (local) people are going to go into vlogging ... and I&#039;m sure there could be some good results if it&#039;s done properly and bandwidth is not an issue.

I won&#039;t dismiss the idea for myself just yet, but hells it seems VERY daunting. Not sure if it&#039;s up my introvert alley =)

Seesmic sounds interesting but I think I&#039;m being stupid - how do I actually view your video? There&#039;s no &quot;play&quot; button - can I only see it by creating an account or what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this Paul &#8211; good food for thought.</p>
<p>I think a lot of (local) people are going to go into vlogging &#8230; and I&#8217;m sure there could be some good results if it&#8217;s done properly and bandwidth is not an issue.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t dismiss the idea for myself just yet, but hells it seems VERY daunting. Not sure if it&#8217;s up my introvert alley =)</p>
<p>Seesmic sounds interesting but I think I&#8217;m being stupid &#8211; how do I actually view your video? There&#8217;s no &#8220;play&#8221; button &#8211; can I only see it by creating an account or what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justBcoz</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2008/07/15/thoughts-about-video-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-3212</link>
		<dc:creator>justBcoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=2662#comment-3212</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this Paul - good food for thought.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think a lot of (local) people are going to go into vlogging ... and I&#039;m sure there could be some good results if it&#039;s done properly and bandwidth is not an issue. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I won&#039;t dismiss the idea for myself just yet, but hells it seems VERY daunting. Not sure if it&#039;s up my introvert alley =)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seesmic sounds interesting but I think I&#039;m being stupid - how do I actually view your video? There&#039;s no &quot;play&quot; button - can I only see it by creating an account or what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this Paul &#8211; good food for thought.</p>
<p>I think a lot of (local) people are going to go into vlogging &#8230; and I&#39;m sure there could be some good results if it&#39;s done properly and bandwidth is not an issue. </p>
<p>I won&#39;t dismiss the idea for myself just yet, but hells it seems VERY daunting. Not sure if it&#39;s up my introvert alley =)</p>
<p>Seesmic sounds interesting but I think I&#39;m being stupid &#8211; how do I actually view your video? There&#39;s no &#8220;play&#8221; button &#8211; can I only see it by creating an account or what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2008/07/15/thoughts-about-video-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-3204</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=2662#comment-3204</guid>
		<description>Thanks SheeBee.  I don&#039;t see myself giving up text for video but I do like the opportunities that video presents.  I am growing more and more partial to Seesmic given my current setup.  It would be fun to do more video stuff but there is the challenge you touched on - sufficient bandwidth to make video more appealing to more people.  Then again, that is another reason Seesmic is a good option.  It doesn&#039;t seem to be as bandwidth intensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks SheeBee.  I don&#8217;t see myself giving up text for video but I do like the opportunities that video presents.  I am growing more and more partial to Seesmic given my current setup.  It would be fun to do more video stuff but there is the challenge you touched on &#8211; sufficient bandwidth to make video more appealing to more people.  Then again, that is another reason Seesmic is a good option.  It doesn&#8217;t seem to be as bandwidth intensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2008/07/15/thoughts-about-video-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-3213</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=2662#comment-3213</guid>
		<description>Thanks SheeBee.  I don&#039;t see myself giving up text for video but I do like the opportunities that video presents.  I am growing more and more partial to Seesmic given my current setup.  It would be fun to do more video stuff but there is the challenge you touched on - sufficient bandwidth to make video more appealing to more people.  Then again, that is another reason Seesmic is a good option.  It doesn&#039;t seem to be as bandwidth intensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks SheeBee.  I don&#39;t see myself giving up text for video but I do like the opportunities that video presents.  I am growing more and more partial to Seesmic given my current setup.  It would be fun to do more video stuff but there is the challenge you touched on &#8211; sufficient bandwidth to make video more appealing to more people.  Then again, that is another reason Seesmic is a good option.  It doesn&#39;t seem to be as bandwidth intensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
