<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How much do we trust Google with our private information?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pauljacobson.org/2007/08/07/how-much-do-we-trust-google-with-our-private-information/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2007/08/07/how-much-do-we-trust-google-with-our-private-information/</link>
	<description>blogger.  evangelist.  maven.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:14:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2007/08/07/how-much-do-we-trust-google-with-our-private-information/comment-page-1/#comment-2337</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=1841#comment-2337</guid>
		<description>Hi Dennis, thanks for your response.  I took a look at your post at http://www.ddmcd.com/managing-technology/googles-gmail-should-i-or-shouldnt-i.html (I think the period at the end of your link as included in the link) and I noticed the same wording you commented on.  I have been doing some further reading about Google&#039;s retention policy (I haven&#039;t seen one published) and I came across a post on the Google blog (http://tinyurl.com/3cvwzz) and a response on the Threat Level blog (http://tinyurl.com/3dnv4s) that are worth reading.

Aside from this, the policies published on the Gmail site and elsewhere on Google&#039;s properties are not terribly specific when it comes to retention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dennis, thanks for your response.  I took a look at your post at <a href="http://www.ddmcd.com/managing-technology/googles-gmail-should-i-or-shouldnt-i.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ddmcd.com/managing-technology/googles-gmail-should-i-or-shouldnt-i.html</a> (I think the period at the end of your link as included in the link) and I noticed the same wording you commented on.  I have been doing some further reading about Google&#8217;s retention policy (I haven&#8217;t seen one published) and I came across a post on the Google blog (<a href="http://tinyurl.com/3cvwzz" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/3cvwzz</a>) and a response on the Threat Level blog (<a href="http://tinyurl.com/3dnv4s" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/3dnv4s</a>) that are worth reading.</p>
<p>Aside from this, the policies published on the Gmail site and elsewhere on Google&#8217;s properties are not terribly specific when it comes to retention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2007/08/07/how-much-do-we-trust-google-with-our-private-information/comment-page-1/#comment-2338</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=1841#comment-2338</guid>
		<description>Hi Dennis, thanks for your response.  I took a look at your post at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ddmcd.com/managing-technology/googles-gmail-should-i-or-shouldnt-i.html&quot;&gt;http://www.ddmcd.com/managing-technology/google...&lt;/a&gt; (I think the period at the end of your link as included in the link) and I noticed the same wording you commented on.  I have been doing some further reading about Google&#039;s retention policy (I haven&#039;t seen one published) and I came across a post on the Google blog (&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/3cvwzz&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/3cvwzz&lt;/a&gt;) and a response on the Threat Level blog (&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/3dnv4s&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/3dnv4s&lt;/a&gt;) that are worth reading.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Aside from this, the policies published on the Gmail site and elsewhere on Google&#039;s properties are not terribly specific when it comes to retention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dennis, thanks for your response.  I took a look at your post at <a href="http://www.ddmcd.com/managing-technology/googles-gmail-should-i-or-shouldnt-i.html"></a><a href="http://www.ddmcd.com/managing-technology/google.." rel="nofollow">http://www.ddmcd.com/managing-technology/google..</a>. (I think the period at the end of your link as included in the link) and I noticed the same wording you commented on.  I have been doing some further reading about Google&#39;s retention policy (I haven&#39;t seen one published) and I came across a post on the Google blog (<a href="http://tinyurl.com/3cvwzz">http://tinyurl.com/3cvwzz</a>) and a response on the Threat Level blog (<a href="http://tinyurl.com/3dnv4s">http://tinyurl.com/3dnv4s</a>) that are worth reading.</p>
<p>Aside from this, the policies published on the Gmail site and elsewhere on Google&#39;s properties are not terribly specific when it comes to retention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis McDonald</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2007/08/07/how-much-do-we-trust-google-with-our-private-information/comment-page-1/#comment-2336</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=1841#comment-2336</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not just what they do with it it&#039;s how long they keep it. See this post of mine from 2005 when I was considering gmail: http://www.ddmcd.com/managing-technology/googles-gmail-should-i-or-shouldnt-i.html. I wonder if Google retention policies (which I assumed then were perpetual) have changed since then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just what they do with it it&#8217;s how long they keep it. See this post of mine from 2005 when I was considering gmail: <a href="http://www.ddmcd.com/managing-technology/googles-gmail-should-i-or-shouldnt-i.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ddmcd.com/managing-technology/googles-gmail-should-i-or-shouldnt-i.html</a>. I wonder if Google retention policies (which I assumed then were perpetual) have changed since then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis McDonald</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2007/08/07/how-much-do-we-trust-google-with-our-private-information/comment-page-1/#comment-2339</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=1841#comment-2339</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not just what they do with it it&#039;s how long they keep it. See this post of mine from 2005 when I was considering gmail: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ddmcd.com/managing-technology/googles-gmail-should-i-or-shouldnt-i.html&quot;&gt;http://www.ddmcd.com/managing-technology/google...&lt;/a&gt;. I wonder if Google retention policies (which I assumed then were perpetual) have changed since then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s not just what they do with it it&#39;s how long they keep it. See this post of mine from 2005 when I was considering gmail: <a href="http://www.ddmcd.com/managing-technology/googles-gmail-should-i-or-shouldnt-i.html"></a><a href="http://www.ddmcd.com/managing-technology/google.." rel="nofollow">http://www.ddmcd.com/managing-technology/google..</a>.. I wonder if Google retention policies (which I assumed then were perpetual) have changed since then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
