<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress isn&#8217;t just for blogs, you know</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pauljacobson.org/2006/12/22/wordpress-isnt-just-for-blogs-you-know/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/12/22/wordpress-isnt-just-for-blogs-you-know/</link>
	<description>blogger.  evangelist.  maven.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:14:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Kirsten</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/12/22/wordpress-isnt-just-for-blogs-you-know/comment-page-1/#comment-1240</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Kirsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 23:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chilibean.co.za/?p=399#comment-1240</guid>
		<description>Hey there,

My own site, heitamag.com is built on wordpress, while still having a majorly &quot;bloggy&quot; look and feel about it, still has a lot of things in it that one more associate with a more traditional CMS.

As for doing sites purely as a static site or completely non-bloggy look and feel, is easy enough. You need to make use of a plugin, but still simple enough. Filosofo Homepage is plugin I am using on a client site. Works brilliantly. As well as the page organiser plugin.

Wordpress rocks. It really does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there,</p>
<p>My own site, heitamag.com is built on wordpress, while still having a majorly &#8220;bloggy&#8221; look and feel about it, still has a lot of things in it that one more associate with a more traditional CMS.</p>
<p>As for doing sites purely as a static site or completely non-bloggy look and feel, is easy enough. You need to make use of a plugin, but still simple enough. Filosofo Homepage is plugin I am using on a client site. Works brilliantly. As well as the page organiser plugin.</p>
<p>Wordpress rocks. It really does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Kirsten</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/12/22/wordpress-isnt-just-for-blogs-you-know/comment-page-1/#comment-1241</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Kirsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chilibean.co.za/?p=399#comment-1241</guid>
		<description>Hey there,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My own site, &lt;a href=&quot;http://heitamag.com&quot;&gt;heitamag.com&lt;/a&gt; is built on wordpress, while still having a majorly &quot;bloggy&quot; look and feel about it, still has a lot of things in it that one more associate with a more traditional CMS.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for doing sites purely as a static site or completely non-bloggy look and feel, is easy enough. You need to make use of a plugin, but still simple enough. Filosofo Homepage is plugin I am using on a client site. Works brilliantly. As well as the page organiser plugin.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wordpress rocks. It really does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there,</p>
<p>My own site, <a href="http://heitamag.com">heitamag.com</a> is built on wordpress, while still having a majorly &#8220;bloggy&#8221; look and feel about it, still has a lot of things in it that one more associate with a more traditional CMS.</p>
<p>As for doing sites purely as a static site or completely non-bloggy look and feel, is easy enough. You need to make use of a plugin, but still simple enough. Filosofo Homepage is plugin I am using on a client site. Works brilliantly. As well as the page organiser plugin.</p>
<p>Wordpress rocks. It really does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nothing special about social media at chilibean</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/12/22/wordpress-isnt-just-for-blogs-you-know/comment-page-1/#comment-1239</link>
		<dc:creator>Nothing special about social media at chilibean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 23:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chilibean.co.za/?p=399#comment-1239</guid>
		<description>[...] I suspect our mainstream media is a little bit behind their American cousins so it will be a little longer before we can make the same claim here but it will happen.Â  It reminds me about a conversation I have with people about blogs.Â  I tell people that blogs are really a new format of website.Â  They aren&#8217;t anything in particular (that is, they aren&#8217;t diaries or journals or anything like that, at least not inherently).Â  It is more a question of what you use the blogging software for.Â  A good example is the use of WordPress as the engine for a largely static site but with feeds built in. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I suspect our mainstream media is a little bit behind their American cousins so it will be a little longer before we can make the same claim here but it will happen.Â  It reminds me about a conversation I have with people about blogs.Â  I tell people that blogs are really a new format of website.Â  They aren&#8217;t anything in particular (that is, they aren&#8217;t diaries or journals or anything like that, at least not inherently).Â  It is more a question of what you use the blogging software for.Â  A good example is the use of WordPress as the engine for a largely static site but with feeds built in. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nothing special about social m</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/12/22/wordpress-isnt-just-for-blogs-you-know/comment-page-1/#comment-1242</link>
		<dc:creator>Nothing special about social m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 22:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chilibean.co.za/?p=399#comment-1242</guid>
		<description>[...] I suspect our mainstream media is a little bit behind their American cousins so it will be a little longer before we can make the same claim here but it will happen.Â  It reminds me about a conversation I have with people about blogs.Â  I tell people that blogs are really a new format of website.Â  They aren&#8217;t anything in particular (that is, they aren&#8217;t diaries or journals or anything like that, at least not inherently).Â  It is more a question of what you use the blogging software for.Â  A good example is the use of WordPress as the engine for a largely static site but with feeds built in. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I suspect our mainstream media is a little bit behind their American cousins so it will be a little longer before we can make the same claim here but it will happen.Â  It reminds me about a conversation I have with people about blogs.Â  I tell people that blogs are really a new format of website.Â  They aren&#8217;t anything in particular (that is, they aren&#8217;t diaries or journals or anything like that, at least not inherently).Â  It is more a question of what you use the blogging software for.Â  A good example is the use of WordPress as the engine for a largely static site but with feeds built in. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rafiq</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/12/22/wordpress-isnt-just-for-blogs-you-know/comment-page-1/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator>rafiq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chilibean.co.za/?p=399#comment-1238</guid>
		<description>Wordpress 2.1 will be good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wordpress 2.1 will be good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rafiq</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/12/22/wordpress-isnt-just-for-blogs-you-know/comment-page-1/#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator>rafiq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chilibean.co.za/?p=399#comment-1243</guid>
		<description>Wordpress 2.1 will be good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wordpress 2.1 will be good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
