<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Restraint of trade agreements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pauljacobson.org/2006/05/30/restraint-of-trade-agreements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/05/30/restraint-of-trade-agreements/</link>
	<description>blogger.  evangelist.  maven.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:24:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pauljacobson</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/05/30/restraint-of-trade-agreements/comment-page-1/#comment-4781</link>
		<dc:creator>pauljacobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=858#comment-4781</guid>
		<description>That does sound unreasonable but it will really depend on your specific circumstances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That does sound unreasonable but it will really depend on your specific circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tanzmurray</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/05/30/restraint-of-trade-agreements/comment-page-1/#comment-4780</link>
		<dc:creator>tanzmurray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=858#comment-4780</guid>
		<description>In my contract it is said that restraint of trade is for 5 years. Following the termination of the employment with the employer for any cause I can not work any where in South Africa and all foreign countries where dealers and distributors of the employer at that time exist, Would this be considered to be unreasonable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my contract it is said that restraint of trade is for 5 years. Following the termination of the employment with the employer for any cause I can not work any where in South Africa and all foreign countries where dealers and distributors of the employer at that time exist, Would this be considered to be unreasonable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pauljacobson</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/05/30/restraint-of-trade-agreements/comment-page-1/#comment-4751</link>
		<dc:creator>pauljacobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=858#comment-4751</guid>
		<description>That does sound unreasonable but it will really depend on your specific circumstances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That does sound unreasonable but it will really depend on your specific circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tanzmurray</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/05/30/restraint-of-trade-agreements/comment-page-1/#comment-4750</link>
		<dc:creator>tanzmurray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=858#comment-4750</guid>
		<description>In my contract it is said that restraint of trade is for 5 years. Following the termination of the employment with the employer for any cause I can not work any where in South Africa and all foreign countries where dealers and distributors of the employer at that time exist, Would this be considered to be unreasonable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my contract it is said that restraint of trade is for 5 years. Following the termination of the employment with the employer for any cause I can not work any where in South Africa and all foreign countries where dealers and distributors of the employer at that time exist, Would this be considered to be unreasonable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pauljacobson</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/05/30/restraint-of-trade-agreements/comment-page-1/#comment-3402</link>
		<dc:creator>pauljacobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=858#comment-3402</guid>
		<description>Yes, that is true and sometimes advisable for companies which face an exodus of staff to the competition.  It can be expensive but if you have a company determined to squash unlawful competition this way, it can be an effective strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that is true and sometimes advisable for companies which face an exodus of staff to the competition.  It can be expensive but if you have a company determined to squash unlawful competition this way, it can be an effective strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pauljacobson</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/05/30/restraint-of-trade-agreements/comment-page-1/#comment-3403</link>
		<dc:creator>pauljacobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=858#comment-3403</guid>
		<description>No, that would probably render it unreasonable and unenforceable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, that would probably render it unreasonable and unenforceable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jewellery Talk   </title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/05/30/restraint-of-trade-agreements/comment-page-1/#comment-3401</link>
		<dc:creator>Jewellery Talk   </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=858#comment-3401</guid>
		<description>enforcement of restraint of trade provisions.  Some companies will enforce a restraint, regardless of the possible threat by the employee because it is more important to deter similar conduct by other employees</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>enforcement of restraint of trade provisions.  Some companies will enforce a restraint, regardless of the possible threat by the employee because it is more important to deter similar conduct by other employees</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pauljacobson</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/05/30/restraint-of-trade-agreements/comment-page-1/#comment-860</link>
		<dc:creator>pauljacobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=858#comment-860</guid>
		<description>Yes, that is true and sometimes advisable for companies which face an exodus of staff to the competition.  It can be expensive but if you have a company determined to squash unlawful competition this way, it can be an effective strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that is true and sometimes advisable for companies which face an exodus of staff to the competition.  It can be expensive but if you have a company determined to squash unlawful competition this way, it can be an effective strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pauljacobson</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/05/30/restraint-of-trade-agreements/comment-page-1/#comment-3333</link>
		<dc:creator>pauljacobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=858#comment-3333</guid>
		<description>Yes, that is true and sometimes advisable for companies which face an exodus of staff to the competition.  It can be expensive but if you have a company determined to squash unlawful competition this way, it can be an effective strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that is true and sometimes advisable for companies which face an exodus of staff to the competition.  It can be expensive but if you have a company determined to squash unlawful competition this way, it can be an effective strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pauljacobson</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/05/30/restraint-of-trade-agreements/comment-page-1/#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator>pauljacobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=858#comment-859</guid>
		<description>No, that would probably render it unreasonable and unenforceable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, that would probably render it unreasonable and unenforceable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
