<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Incredulous!  That is the word.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pauljacobson.org/2006/04/28/incredulous-that-is-the-word/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/04/28/incredulous-that-is-the-word/</link>
	<description>blogger.  evangelist.  maven.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:14:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/04/28/incredulous-that-is-the-word/comment-page-1/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 04:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=790#comment-766</guid>
		<description>I had a further exchange with David Wilson by email after these comments.  Here it is:

&quot;thanks for the comment but you have not approved it?
i don&#039;t get it ... whatever ...
?
in any case?i see that you subscribe to the ideology of victimhood, nonsense, so be it, be well, David

&quot;Hi David


The comments are automatically held over for moderation.? I get quite a bit of spam.


I am generally not a big fan of the notion of a victim but I just couldn&#039;t think of a better term for what I was trying to express.

&quot;ok then, really i would rather see exchanges like this published, email is ok but the benefit (if indeed there is any :-)) has to be in others being at least passively involved

camille paglia has set me to wondering about victimhood, she is more than a bit mouthy but makes some good points - it is almost automatic (for Canadians at least) to side with the underdog, when i saw George Weah vs Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf i assumed Sirleaf would win, it took another Canadian, Gwynne Dyer, to open the wide angle lens for me on that one

but ... look man, this AIDS business is sexual, and it takes two to tango, dig it! or do you think that every case of AIDS is the result of rape? men have to be dying of it at about the same rate as women, if we daemonize the men and make all the women victims then i can&#039;t see any way out of it that i am willing to contemplate, and ANYWAY such judgements as these are obviously divorced from any reality whatsoever, you seem like a smart guy, i hope you can fill in the holes in my sketch

be well, David.&quot;

David has an interesting perspective.  I wonder how applicable the principle is to South Africa where gender inquality is ingrained and often women don&#039;t recognise the choice that they have?

I am hardly an expert on these issues and I am interested in anyone else&#039;s views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a further exchange with David Wilson by email after these comments.  Here it is:</p>
<p>&#8220;thanks for the comment but you have not approved it?<br />
i don&#8217;t get it &#8230; whatever &#8230;<br />
?<br />
in any case?i see that you subscribe to the ideology of victimhood, nonsense, so be it, be well, David</p>
<p>&#8220;Hi David</p>
<p>The comments are automatically held over for moderation.? I get quite a bit of spam.</p>
<p>I am generally not a big fan of the notion of a victim but I just couldn&#8217;t think of a better term for what I was trying to express.</p>
<p>&#8220;ok then, really i would rather see exchanges like this published, email is ok but the benefit (if indeed there is any <img src='http://pauljacobson.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ) has to be in others being at least passively involved</p>
<p>camille paglia has set me to wondering about victimhood, she is more than a bit mouthy but makes some good points &#8211; it is almost automatic (for Canadians at least) to side with the underdog, when i saw George Weah vs Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf i assumed Sirleaf would win, it took another Canadian, Gwynne Dyer, to open the wide angle lens for me on that one</p>
<p>but &#8230; look man, this AIDS business is sexual, and it takes two to tango, dig it! or do you think that every case of AIDS is the result of rape? men have to be dying of it at about the same rate as women, if we daemonize the men and make all the women victims then i can&#8217;t see any way out of it that i am willing to contemplate, and ANYWAY such judgements as these are obviously divorced from any reality whatsoever, you seem like a smart guy, i hope you can fill in the holes in my sketch</p>
<p>be well, David.&#8221;</p>
<p>David has an interesting perspective.  I wonder how applicable the principle is to South Africa where gender inquality is ingrained and often women don&#8217;t recognise the choice that they have?</p>
<p>I am hardly an expert on these issues and I am interested in anyone else&#8217;s views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/04/28/incredulous-that-is-the-word/comment-page-1/#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 04:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=790#comment-767</guid>
		<description>I had a further exchange with David Wilson by email after these comments.  Here it is:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;thanks for the comment but you have not approved it?&lt;br&gt;i don&#039;t get it ... whatever ...&lt;br&gt;?&lt;br&gt;in any case?i see that you subscribe to the ideology of victimhood, nonsense, so be it, be well, David&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Hi David&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The comments are automatically held over for moderation.? I get quite a bit of spam.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am generally not a big fan of the notion of a victim but I just couldn&#039;t think of a better term for what I was trying to express.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;ok then, really i would rather see exchanges like this published, email is ok but the benefit (if indeed there is any :-)) has to be in others being at least passively involved&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;camille paglia has set me to wondering about victimhood, she is more than a bit mouthy but makes some good points - it is almost automatic (for Canadians at least) to side with the underdog, when i saw George Weah vs Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf i assumed Sirleaf would win, it took another Canadian, Gwynne Dyer, to open the wide angle lens for me on that one&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;but ... look man, this AIDS business is sexual, and it takes two to tango, dig it! or do you think that every case of AIDS is the result of rape? men have to be dying of it at about the same rate as women, if we daemonize the men and make all the women victims then i can&#039;t see any way out of it that i am willing to contemplate, and ANYWAY such judgements as these are obviously divorced from any reality whatsoever, you seem like a smart guy, i hope you can fill in the holes in my sketch&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;be well, David.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;David has an interesting perspective.  I wonder how applicable the principle is to South Africa where gender inquality is ingrained and often women don&#039;t recognise the choice that they have?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am hardly an expert on these issues and I am interested in anyone else&#039;s views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a further exchange with David Wilson by email after these comments.  Here it is:</p>
<p>&#8220;thanks for the comment but you have not approved it?<br />i don&#39;t get it &#8230; whatever &#8230;<br />?<br />in any case?i see that you subscribe to the ideology of victimhood, nonsense, so be it, be well, David</p>
<p>&#8220;Hi David</p>
<p>The comments are automatically held over for moderation.? I get quite a bit of spam.</p>
<p>I am generally not a big fan of the notion of a victim but I just couldn&#39;t think of a better term for what I was trying to express.</p>
<p>&#8220;ok then, really i would rather see exchanges like this published, email is ok but the benefit (if indeed there is any <img src='http://pauljacobson.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ) has to be in others being at least passively involved</p>
<p>camille paglia has set me to wondering about victimhood, she is more than a bit mouthy but makes some good points &#8211; it is almost automatic (for Canadians at least) to side with the underdog, when i saw George Weah vs Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf i assumed Sirleaf would win, it took another Canadian, Gwynne Dyer, to open the wide angle lens for me on that one</p>
<p>but &#8230; look man, this AIDS business is sexual, and it takes two to tango, dig it! or do you think that every case of AIDS is the result of rape? men have to be dying of it at about the same rate as women, if we daemonize the men and make all the women victims then i can&#39;t see any way out of it that i am willing to contemplate, and ANYWAY such judgements as these are obviously divorced from any reality whatsoever, you seem like a smart guy, i hope you can fill in the holes in my sketch</p>
<p>be well, David.&#8221;</p>
<p>David has an interesting perspective.  I wonder how applicable the principle is to South Africa where gender inquality is ingrained and often women don&#39;t recognise the choice that they have?</p>
<p>I am hardly an expert on these issues and I am interested in anyone else&#39;s views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/04/28/incredulous-that-is-the-word/comment-page-1/#comment-765</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 21:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=790#comment-765</guid>
		<description>Hi David

Thanks for your comment.  Sorry about the hassles with the comments fields.  I am relying on the default installation at the moment and didn&#039;t realise there was this issue (my other blogs are TypePad blogs and those things are pretty much taken care of).

To me the true victims are women who are still marginalised and subjected to the domineering male mentality that seems to pervade South African society in addition to people living with HIV/AIDS and who are largely ignored or whose disease is not taken seriously by men who believe that having sex with a virgin or with a child cures them of AIDS.

That may be just the tip of the ice berg.

Thanks for taking time to read this blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment.  Sorry about the hassles with the comments fields.  I am relying on the default installation at the moment and didn&#8217;t realise there was this issue (my other blogs are TypePad blogs and those things are pretty much taken care of).</p>
<p>To me the true victims are women who are still marginalised and subjected to the domineering male mentality that seems to pervade South African society in addition to people living with HIV/AIDS and who are largely ignored or whose disease is not taken seriously by men who believe that having sex with a virgin or with a child cures them of AIDS.</p>
<p>That may be just the tip of the ice berg.</p>
<p>Thanks for taking time to read this blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/04/28/incredulous-that-is-the-word/comment-page-1/#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 21:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=790#comment-768</guid>
		<description>Hi David&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for your comment.  Sorry about the hassles with the comments fields.  I am relying on the default installation at the moment and didn&#039;t realise there was this issue (my other blogs are TypePad blogs and those things are pretty much taken care of).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To me the true victims are women who are still marginalised and subjected to the domineering male mentality that seems to pervade South African society in addition to people living with HIV/AIDS and who are largely ignored or whose disease is not taken seriously by men who believe that having sex with a virgin or with a child cures them of AIDS.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That may be just the tip of the ice berg.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for taking time to read this blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment.  Sorry about the hassles with the comments fields.  I am relying on the default installation at the moment and didn&#39;t realise there was this issue (my other blogs are TypePad blogs and those things are pretty much taken care of).</p>
<p>To me the true victims are women who are still marginalised and subjected to the domineering male mentality that seems to pervade South African society in addition to people living with HIV/AIDS and who are largely ignored or whose disease is not taken seriously by men who believe that having sex with a virgin or with a child cures them of AIDS.</p>
<p>That may be just the tip of the ice berg.</p>
<p>Thanks for taking time to read this blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wilson</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/04/28/incredulous-that-is-the-word/comment-page-1/#comment-764</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 21:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=790#comment-764</guid>
		<description>i followed your &#039;true victim&#039; link but i am still not clear on who you may think the true victim is? just curious

my take is that since Zuma is clearly ignorant about AIDS, and he is the chairman of the South African AIDS Council, the victims are the men, women, and children suffering and dying of AIDS in South Africa

or is that too simple minded?

i like your blog and have bookmarked it for future visits, one thought - it might be good to tell people that the email and url are mandatory fields, i usually don&#039;t just to avoid being confused for a spammer, but this time i had to type it all twice :-))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i followed your &#8216;true victim&#8217; link but i am still not clear on who you may think the true victim is? just curious</p>
<p>my take is that since Zuma is clearly ignorant about AIDS, and he is the chairman of the South African AIDS Council, the victims are the men, women, and children suffering and dying of AIDS in South Africa</p>
<p>or is that too simple minded?</p>
<p>i like your blog and have bookmarked it for future visits, one thought &#8211; it might be good to tell people that the email and url are mandatory fields, i usually don&#8217;t just to avoid being confused for a spammer, but this time i had to type it all twice <img src='http://pauljacobson.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wilson</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/04/28/incredulous-that-is-the-word/comment-page-1/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 21:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=790#comment-769</guid>
		<description>i followed your &#039;true victim&#039; link but i am still not clear on who you may think the true victim is? just curious&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;my take is that since Zuma is clearly ignorant about AIDS, and he is the chairman of the South African AIDS Council, the victims are the men, women, and children suffering and dying of AIDS in South Africa&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;or is that too simple minded?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i like your blog and have bookmarked it for future visits, one thought - it might be good to tell people that the email and url are mandatory fields, i usually don&#039;t just to avoid being confused for a spammer, but this time i had to type it all twice :-))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i followed your &#39;true victim&#39; link but i am still not clear on who you may think the true victim is? just curious</p>
<p>my take is that since Zuma is clearly ignorant about AIDS, and he is the chairman of the South African AIDS Council, the victims are the men, women, and children suffering and dying of AIDS in South Africa</p>
<p>or is that too simple minded?</p>
<p>i like your blog and have bookmarked it for future visits, one thought &#8211; it might be good to tell people that the email and url are mandatory fields, i usually don&#39;t just to avoid being confused for a spammer, but this time i had to type it all twice <img src='http://pauljacobson.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
