January 23rd 2006 11:24 pm
G made an excellent point the other day. We should not refer to a “litter” of puppies. It is far more accurate and descriptive to refer to a “silliness” of puppies. Makes perfect sense if you think about it … or if you actually have puppies.
Technorati Tags: puppy, silliness of puppies
« “Non-variation” clauses that can be varied | The wireless iTunes powered home »
Bookmarked 4 links
Bookmarked a link: Mozilla Labs » Blog Archive » Introducing Ubiquity
is using Delicious at http://delicious.com/pauljacobson so feel free to add me to your network, we can swap links!
Favorited 12 videos
would love to know why Standard Bank charges me so much for using my Maestro card? No cash must mean lower costs for the bank!
Liked 20 videos
Copyright © 2008 Paul Jacobson. 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 South Africa License.
WordPress Theme based on a design by Free CSS Templates
Add New Comment
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Add New Comment
Trackbacks