<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenOffice 2.0 Beta disappoints</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pauljacobson.org/2005/03/06/openoffice-20-beta-disappoints/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2005/03/06/openoffice-20-beta-disappoints/</link>
	<description>blogger.  evangelist.  maven.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:31:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2005/03/06/openoffice-20-beta-disappoints/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 05:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=221#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Hi David

I used the pre-release/beta versions up to version 1.9.79 or thereabouts.  Don&#039;t get me wrong, the software is not crap.  I think it is great that it is available and being developed for free.  In fact, if I didn&#039;t get a good deal on MS Office 2003, I&#039;d still be using OpenOffice.org although I&#039;d probably stick with 1.1.4 until 2.0 is released.  The beta versions (I am not sure if they were beta or had some other name) I was using looked much better than 1.1.4 and did some really good stuff for me.  There was the odd crash but that was to be expected.

Ultimately though, I expected something &#039;Wow&#039; and when the chance to get MS Office came up I jumped at it.  I still worry about viruses and all sorts of uglies but I am happy with my decision.

Thanks for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David</p>
<p>I used the pre-release/beta versions up to version 1.9.79 or thereabouts.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, the software is not crap.  I think it is great that it is available and being developed for free.  In fact, if I didn&#8217;t get a good deal on MS Office 2003, I&#8217;d still be using OpenOffice.org although I&#8217;d probably stick with 1.1.4 until 2.0 is released.  The beta versions (I am not sure if they were beta or had some other name) I was using looked much better than 1.1.4 and did some really good stuff for me.  There was the odd crash but that was to be expected.</p>
<p>Ultimately though, I expected something &#8216;Wow&#8217; and when the chance to get MS Office came up I jumped at it.  I still worry about viruses and all sorts of uglies but I am happy with my decision.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Russell</title>
		<link>http://pauljacobson.org/2005/03/06/openoffice-20-beta-disappoints/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>David Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 19:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljacobson.org/?p=221#comment-197</guid>
		<description>Have you actually used the new beta? Maybe it would be better to do so before tearing it apart since it is supposed to be significantly different from 1.x versions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you actually used the new beta? Maybe it would be better to do so before tearing it apart since it is supposed to be significantly different from 1.x versions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
